LANDWATCH LANE CTY. v. LAND CONS. AND DEV.

A159121.

415 P.3d 1064 (2018)

290 Or.App. 694

LANDWATCH LANE COUNTY, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

March 7, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sean T. Malone, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General.

Before DeHoog, Presiding Judge, and Hadlock, Judge, and Sercombe, Senior Judge.


This case concerns whether the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) erred in determining that there was not "good cause to proceed" to an enforcement hearing that petitioner had demanded against Lane County. See ORS 197.324(2)(b) (before proceeding to a hearing on a privately initiated enforcement petition, LCDC...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases