1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 404 P.3d
  5. 404 P.3d 1128 (2017)
 

K. A. L. v. HINKLE

A161950.

404 P.3d 1128 (2017)

288 Or.App. 341

K. A. L., Petitioner-Respondent, v. David John HINKLE, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

October 18, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Missiaen filed the brief for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

Respondent appeals a stalking protective order (SPO) that the trial court entered against him, arguing that the order was not supported by sufficient evidence. We are bound by the trial court's findings of fact if they are supported by "any evidence," and we review its legal conclusions for errors of law. Roth v. King

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases