E.T. v. BELETE

120506470; A152264.

338 P.3d 776 (2014)

266 Or. App. 650

E.T., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Tsige Denkew BELETE, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 29, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul G. Dodds , Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Cary R. Cadonau and Brownstein Rask.

Ken A. Kissir argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge, and EGAN, Judge.


Respondent appeals the trial court's entry of a stalking protective order (SPO) pursuant to ORS 30.866. Assigning error to the court's entry of the SPO, respondent argues that the evidence was legally insufficient. We disagree with respondent and, accordingly, affirm.

Respondent requests that we review the facts de novo. See...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases