1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 303 P.3d
  5. 303 P.3d 346 (2013)
 

DOYLE v. CITY OF MEDFORD

080137L7; A147497.

303 P.3d 346 (2013)

256 Or. App. 625

Ronald DOYLE; and Benedict Miller, Plaintiffs-Respondents, and Robert Deuel; and Charles Steinberg, Plaintiffs-Respondents Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF MEDFORD, an Oregon municipal corporation; and Michael Dyal, City Manager of the City of Medford, in his official capacity and as an individual, Defendants-Appellants Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 15, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Franz, Jr. , Springfield, argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents. With him on the briefs was Law Office of Robert E. Franz, Jr.

Stephen L. Brischetto , Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondents and respondents-cross-appellants.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.

DUNCAN, J.

This case involves four plaintiffs, each of whom retired from employment with the City of Medford (the city) and each of whom attempted to elect to continue the health insurance coverage that the city had provided to them as employees. But the city's health insurance plan that applied to plaintiffs at the time of their retirement did not provide coverage for retirees. Although plaintiffs each had the option to enroll in a retiree health insurance plan with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases