1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 282 P.3d
  5. 282 P.3d 822 (2012)
 

WEBER COASTAL BELLS LTD. PARTNERS v. METRO

(LUBA 2011-080, 2011-081, 2011-082, 2011-083; SC S059872).

282 P.3d 822 (2012)

352 Or. 122

WEBER COASTAL BELLS LIMITED PARTNERS, an Oregon limited partnership; Jantzen/Angel, LLC; Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods and Coalition For A Livable Future, Petitioners below, and Plaid Pantries, Inc., v. METRO and Trimet, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided June 28, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Lilly , Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the memorandum for petitioner Plaid Pantries, Inc.

Mark J. Greenfield , Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent TriMet.

Richard P. Benner , Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent Metro.

DE MUNIZ, J.

Plaid Pantries, Inc. (Plaid Pantries), argues that the land use final order that Metro adopted after a remand from this court does not comply with the applicable statutory standards. See Weber Coastal Bells v. Metro, 351 Or. 548, 273 P.3d 95 (2012) (affirming prior land use final order in part and remanding in part). Metro and Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District of Oregon (TriMet...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases