1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 274 P.3d
  5. 274 P.3d 876 (2012)
 

STATE v. GROOM

08C42589; A142179.

274 P.3d 876 (2012)

249 Or. App. 118

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Amy Michelle GROOM, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 28, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jason E. Thompson and Ferder Casebeer French & Thompson, LLP, Salem, for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.

SCHUMAN, P.J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. In our first opinion, we accepted the state's argument that the warrantless search of defendant's automobile was lawful because it fell within the contours of the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. State v. Groom, 239 Or.App. 462, 244 P.3d 913 (2010). In reaching that conclusion, we relied on State v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases