1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 274 P.3d
  5. 274 P.3d 214 (2012)
 

REITZ v. ERAZO

C091843CV; A142110.

274 P.3d 214 (2012)

248 Or. App. 700

Kathryn REITZ, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Pedro Rolando Reynaud ERAZO, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 14, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond S. Tindell, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Trevor Hensley, Certified Law Student, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were W. Warren H. Binford and Willamette University Clinical Law Program.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.

DUNCAN, J.

Respondent appeals the trial court's entry of a stalking protective order (SPO), arguing that the statutory requirements were not met.1 We review de novo2 and conclude that, at most, one actionable "contact" took place. Therefore, we reverse.

Petitioner and respondent are frequent shoppers at a Goodwill outlet store where all of their interactions took place. Both parties are particularly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases