RUSHBY v. RUSHBY

07DO1818DS; A144086.

270 P.3d 327 (2011)

247 Or. App. 528

In the Matter of the Marriage OF Danial A. RUSHBY, Petitioner-Respondent, and Karen M. RUSHBY, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 29, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen M. Rushby filed the briefs pro se.

Clayton C. Patrick filed the brief for respondent.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and HADLOCK, Judge.


HADLOCK, J.

We address a single legal question in this dissolution case: whether courts may treat retirement accounts that are in payout status solely as income streams (to be considered in analyzing whether to award spousal support) or whether, instead, courts must treat retirement accounts as property (to be included in the division of marital property). We hold that, under ORS 107.105(1)(f), retirement accounts must be treated as property. Because the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases