WOLLHEIM, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment extending his probation to six years from the date of the initial sentencing. Defendant argues that, under ORS 137.010, his probation could be extended only to five years, not six. Defendant acknowledges that he did not raise the issue below, but urges us to reverse on the basis of error apparent on the face of the record. ORAP 5.45(1); see Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.