1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 263 P.3d
  5. 263 P.3d 1034 (2011)
 

MAROLLA v. DPSST

43858; A141119.

263 P.3d 1034 (2011)

245 Or. App. 226

Matthew MAROLLA, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STANDARDS AND TRAINING, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 31, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin T. Lafky, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Leslie D. Gomez.

Ryan Kahn, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and LANDAU, Judge Pro Tempore.

ORTEGA, P.J.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order issued by the Department of Public Safety Standards and Training (DPSST) that revoked petitioner's certification to work as a police officer. This case turns on whether DPSST's administrative rule that requires revocation of certification when an officer is found to have been discharged for cause is consistent with ORS 181.662(4). We conclude that it is and affirm.

The following facts are undisputed unless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases