STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF EDUCATION v. VANTAGE TECHNOLOGIES

07C12927; A141945.

261 P.3d 17 (2011)

243 Or. App. 557

STATE of Oregon, acting by and through its DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VANTAGE TECHNOLOGIES KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENT, LLC, dba Vantage Learning, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 22, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Denise G. Fjordbeck , Attorney-in-Charge, Civil/Administrative Appeals, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were John R. Kroger , Attorney General, and Jerome Lidz , Solicitor General.

Peter J. Deeb argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Craig G. Russillo , Sara Kobak , and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt P.C., and Deeb, Petrakis, Blum & Murphy, P.C.

Before SCHUMAN, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge.


WOLLHEIM, J.

This action arose out of a contract between the State of Oregon, acting through the Department of Education (DOE or the state), and defendant Vantage Technologies Knowledge Assessment, LLC (Vantage), for the provision and administration of software for standardized testing of K-12 students in Oregon schools through the Oregon Technology Enhanced Student Assessment (TESA) system. After the contractual relationship soured, Vantage gave notice of termination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases