1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 259 P.3d
  5. 259 P.3d 985 (2011)
 

NEFF v. SANDTRAX, INC.

08CV0610; A142518.

259 P.3d 985 (2011)

243 Or. App. 485

Geoffery E. NEFF and Peggy Neff, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SANDTRAX, INC., an Oregon corporation; H. Richard Burkholder; S. Jean Burkholder; Richard J. Burkholder; and Tonya A. Burkholder, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 15, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Gould , Coos Bay, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Gould Law Firm, P.C.

William A. McDaniel , Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Whitty, Littlefield, McDaniel & Bodkin, LLP.

Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge, and LANDAU, Judge pro tempore.

ORTEGA, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment regarding the boundary between their parcel and defendants' parcel. The boundary dispute arises from the existence of two possible locations for a section corner: the "BLM corner" or the "Buckingham corner."1 The boundary between plaintiffs' and defendants' parcels depends on the corner's location, resulting in a disputed area of .12 acres. Finding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases