In the Matter of I.C.S., a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
K.A.S., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted January 7, 2011.
Decided February 16, 2011.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Holly Telerant, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals a permanency judgment entered on August 9, 2010.1 In one of mother's assignments of error on appeal, she contends that the "permanency judgment [is] ineffective, as a matter of law," because "under ORS 419B.476(5)(d) a permanency judgment that changes the plan to adoption must include the court's determination of whether one of the reasons to defer filing a termination petition under ORS 419B.498(2) is applicable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.