STATE v. PIERCE

07CR0007FE; A136976.

232 P.3d 978 (2010)

235 Or. App. 372

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nathen Lamar PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 26, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and David B. Thompson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.


ORTEGA, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for, among other crimes, unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135. On appeal, he asserts three assignments of error, two of which we reject without discussion. We write to discuss only defendant's contention that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on elements of unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV) that were not alleged in the indictment, in violation of Article VII (Amended), section 5, of the Oregon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases