1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 228 P.3d
  5. 228 P.3d 1217 (2010)
 

AKEY v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

07AB0040; A134746.

228 P.3d 1217 (2010)

234 Or. App. 393

Daniel AKEY, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 24, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil N. Olsen argued the cause and filed the reply brief for petitioner. On the opening and reply briefs were Ursula A. Kienbaum and Littler Mendelson, P.C.

Judy C. Lucas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

HASELTON, P.J.

Claimant seeks judicial review, pursuant to ORS 657.282 and ORS 657.290(3), of an order on reconsideration of the Employment Appeals Board (board) affirming an administrative law judge's determination that claimant is not entitled to trade readjustment allowance (TRA) benefits under 19 U.S.C. section 2291 (2006 & Supp 2007).1 The facts are not in dispute; thus, we review for errors of law. ORS 183.482(8)(a). Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases