1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 218 P.3d
  5. 218 P.3d 113 (2009)
 

INTERSTATE ROOFING v. SPRINGVILLE CORP.

(CC C04-3118CV; CA A135686; SC S056441).

218 P.3d 113 (2009)

347 Or. 144

INTERSTATE ROOFING, INC., Respondent on Review, v. SPRINGVILLE CORPORATION, fka Springville Associates, Inc., Petitioner on Review, and M & T Real Estate, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided October 1, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Westwood, Stoel Rives, LLP, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs was Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, PC.

Janet M. Schroer, Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, LLP, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on the brief was Marjorie A. Speirs.

LINDER, J.

This case requires us to determine whether certain formalities must be satisfied for a limited judgment to be final and appealable. Specifically, the issues are: (1) whether either a limited judgment document, or the record more generally, must reflect an express determination by the circuit court that there is "no just reason for delay"; and (2) whether a limited judgment document, to finally dispose of a claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases