1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 204 P.3d
  5. 204 P.3d 830 (2009)
 

STATE v. IDOL

051035911; A131719.

204 P.3d 830 (2009)

227 Or. App. 56

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James Brian IDOL, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 1, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andy Simrin, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Simon C. Whang, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and RICHARDSON, Senior Judge.

BREWER, C.J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005), arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion in limine to exclude evidence of a laboratory report on the ground that the criminalist who prepared the report was not made available by the state for cross-examination. Following the trial court's ruling that the laboratory report was admissible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases