1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 202 P.3d
  5. 202 P.3d 883 (2009)
 

STATE v. BRETCHES

060721FE, A134144.

202 P.3d 883 (2009)

225 Or. App. 602

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Christopher Robert BRETCHES, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 11, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil F. Byl, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services.

Karla Ferrall, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and CARSON, Senior Judge.

HASELTON, P.J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a precursor substance, ORS 475.967, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. As explained below, we conclude that, under the analysis of State v. Toevs, 327 Or. 525, 964 P.2d 1007 (1998), the trial court correctly denied suppression. Accordingly, we affirm.

The evidence at the suppression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases