1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 198 P.3d
  5. 198 P.3d 437 (2008)
 

ROSS v. HOLT

180622915; A134886.

198 P.3d 437 (2008)

224 Or. App. 405

Michele E. ROSS, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Aaron R. HOLT, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 10, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Molnar argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Coit and Dean, P.C.

James A. Palmer, Eugene, filed the brief for respondent.

Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

SCHUMAN, J.

In this appeal, respondent challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) issued against him. On de novo review, Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or.App. 525, 537, 953 P.2d 1130 (1998), rev. den., 328 Or. 418, 987 P.2d 512 (1999), we reverse.

Between 2001 and May or June of 2005, petitioner and respondent lived together...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases