1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 241 P.3d
  5. 241 P.3d 301 (2010)
 

STOLL v. CHONG LOR XIONG

No. 107,880. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

241 P.3d 301 (2010)

2010 OK CIV APP 110

Ronald STOLL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CHONG LOR XIONG and Mee Yang, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

September 17, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eddie L. Carr, Christopher D. Wolek, Oliver L. Smith, Gibbs Armstrong Borochoff Mullican & Hart, P.C., Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Mark D. Antinoro, Taylor, Burrage Law Firm, Claremore, OK, for Defendants/Appellees.

Opinion by WM. C. HETHERINGTON, JR., Judge.

¶ 1 Ronald Stoll appeals a judgment finding a clause in his contract with Chong Lor Xiong and Mee Yang (collectively, Buyers) unconscionable. He contends the contract was valid and enforceable. We affirm the trial court's findings the contract paragraph supporting Stoll's claim is unconscionable and Buyers were entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

¶...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases