1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 2013 Ohio
  5. 2013 Ohio 193
 

STATE v. HURST

No. 12-CA-63.

2013 Ohio 193

STATE OF OHIO, Respondent, v. MARK E. HURST, Relator.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Licking County.

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: January 15, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark E. Hurst, pro se, 19 East Street, Newark, Ohio 43055, For Relator.

Kenneth W. Oswalt, Amy Brown Thompson (#0070511), Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, 20 South Second Street, 4th Floor, Newark, Ohio 43055, For Respondent.

Sheila G. Farmer P.J., William B. Hoffman J. and John W. Wise J., Judges.

OPINION

FARMER, P.J.

{¶1} Petitioner Mark E. Hurst has filed a "Motion and/or Petition for a Writ of Mandamus" requesting a writ be issued which would require the trial court to rule on a motion that Petitioner filed in the trial court. Respondent, the State of Ohio, has filed a Motion to Dismiss based upon several procedural defects in the petition.

{¶2} We find Petitioner has not properly brought this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases