IN RE CONTEST OF ELECTION HELD ON STARK COUNTY ISSUE 6 (LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DISTRICT) IN GENERAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 8, 2011; BISHOP ET AL., Appellees AND Cross-Appellants; CITIZENS FOR LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE ET AL., Appellants AND Cross-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted April 3, 2012.
Decided May 16, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Baker, Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews, Eric J. Stecz, and Mel L. Lute Jr.; and Grady Law Office, L.L.C., and Michael J. Grady, for appellees and cross-appellants.
Hall Law Firm and Charles D. Hall III; and Alysse L. McCandlish, for appellant and cross-appellee Citizens for the Lake Township Police.
John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Deborah A. Dawson and David M. Bridenstine, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant and cross-appellee Lake Township Board of Trustees.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} These are consolidated appeals and a cross-appeal from a judgment of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas setting aside a November 8, 2011 election on Issue 6 in Lake Township, Stark County, Ohio, that approved expansion of the Uniontown Police District to include all of Lake Township's unincorporated territory and levied a property tax for that purpose. Because the common pleas court did not err in setting aside...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
