STAMMCO, L.L.C., D.B.A. THE POP SHOP, et al., Appellees,
v.
UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF OHIO, D.B.A. SPRINT, et al., Appellants.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted October 21, 2009.
Decided March 24, 2010.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., Dennis E. Murray Sr., and Donna J. Evans, for appellees.
Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P., Michael K. Farrell, Thomas D. Warren, Karl Fanter, and John B. Lewis, for appellants.
Aneel L. Chablani, Andrew D. Neuhauser, and Stanley A. Hirtle; Burdge Law Office Co., L.P.A., and Ronald L. Burdge; and Stephen Gardner, urging affirmance for amici curiae Advocates for Basic Legal Equality, Inc., and National Association of Consumer Advocates.
Linda S. Woggon, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Chamber of Commerce.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
LANZINGER, J.
{¶ 1} We accepted this discretionary appeal to consider two propositions concerning the definition of a class for purposes of a class action under Civ.R. 23. Appellants, United Telephone Company of Ohio and Sprint Nextel Corporation, ask us to hold that the trial court's class certification is improper under Civ.R. 23 and that the case cannot be maintained as a class action. Because the class definition does not allow the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
