STATE v. BARTRUM

No. 2007-2193.

121 Ohio St.3d 148 (2009)

2009-Ohio-355

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BARTRUM, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 5, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Christopher P. Muntean, for appellee.


LANZINGER, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we accepted the state of Ohio's sole proposition of law to determine whether an actual minor must exist in order to convict the defendant of a violation of former R.C. 2907.21(A)(3), compelling prostitution of a minor. Because the statute is ambiguous and therefore must be strictly construed against the state, we hold that under former R.C. 2907.21(A)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases