1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 215 A.D.3d
  5. 215 A.D.3d 517 (2023)
 

BARTEL v. LINES

Index No. 190083/17. Appeal No. 16595. Case No. 2021-04421.

215 A.D.3d 517 (2023)

189 N.Y.S.3d 14

2023 NY Slip Op 02057

Willard E. Bartel et al., Respondents, v. Farrell Lines, Individually and as Successor in Interest to American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 20, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thompson Hine LLP, New York (Anna K. Stark of counsel), and Thompson Hine LLP, Cleveland, OH (Eric S. Daniel of the bar of the State of Ohio, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for appellants.

Motley Rice LLC, New York (Meredith Clark of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Renwick, A.P.J., Moulton, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York (Adam Silvera, J.), entered on or about October 18, 2021, which granted plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint, and denied the cross motion of defendants Farrell Lines, individually and as successor in interest to American Export Isbrandtsen Lines (Farrell-Isbrandtsen) and Keystone Shipping Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, affirmed, without costs.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases