Defendant's "valid waiver[] of the right to appeal preclude[s] review of his argument[] that the mandatory surcharge[] and fees imposed on him at sentencing should be vacated ... pursuant to CPL 420.35(2-a)" (People v Count C., 206 A.D.3d 496, 496 [1st Dept 2022]), and this is not a case where the People have agreed to "waive[] the waiver" (Garza v Idaho, 586 US ___, ___,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.