As there has been no final determination of a pending motion to vacate a June 2018 order dismissing a prior foreclosure action, it is premature to consider whether defendant, as successor-in-interest to the prior mortgagee, may commence a new foreclosure action under the savings clause of CPLR 205(a) in the event the motion to vacate is denied (see Ambac Assur. Corp. v Countrywide Home Loans Inc., 179 A.D.3d 518, 520 [1st Dept 2020]; Ali v Effron,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
1812 LACOMBE AVE, LLC v. NEWREZ LLC
208 A.D.3d 1083 (2022)
174 N.Y.S.3d 264
2022 NY Slip Op 05261
1812 Lacombe Ave, LLC, Respondent, v. NewRez LLC, Doing Business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 27, 2022.
Decided September 27, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Akerman LLP, New York (Jordan M. Smith of counsel), for appellant.
Petroff Amshen LLP, Brooklyn (James Tierney of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Webber, J.P., Kern, Singh, Moulton, Shulman, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.