Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining the mother's motion to relocate with the child without holding a hearing, appointing an attorney for the child, or ordering a forensic examination. Supreme Court, which was operating under time constraints imposed by the imminent start of the school year, had sufficient, uncontroverted information before it from the parents' motion papers to make an informed decision regarding the child's best interests (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KESSLER v. CHARNEY
305890/13, Appeal No. 16114, Case No. 2021-03379.
206 A.D.3d 450 (2022)
167 N.Y.S.3d 793
2022 NY Slip Op 03797
Hollis Kessler, Respondent, v. Robert H. Charney, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 9, 2022.
Decided June 9, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C., New York (David H. Pikus of counsel), for appellant.
Rower LLC, New York (Kara M. Bellew of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Shulman, Rodriguez, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.