1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 206 A.D.3d
  5. 206 A.D.3d 764 (2022)
 

PEOPLE v. RIDDICK

Not in source.

206 A.D.3d 764 (2022)

167 N.Y.S.3d 834

2022 NY Slip Op 03747

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christina Riddick, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 8, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justine Luongo, Attorney-in-Charge of the Criminal Defense Practice, New York, NY (Jonathan Garelick of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

Duffy, J.P., Iannacci, Maltese and Genovesi, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating so much of the sentence as imposed mandatory surcharges and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of probation imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80 [1982]).

As consented to by the People, we modify the judgment by vacating the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases