The actions for which petitioner seeks to hold respondent in contempt are outside the scope of the arbitration award, which did not discuss or determine respondent's right to redeploy other categories of sergeants. Thus, as the court found, petitioner cannot demonstrate the required showing of a violation of a clear and unequivocal court mandate to support a finding of civil contempt (see El-Dehdan v El-Dehdan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE & TUNNEL AUTH. SUPERIOR OFFICERS BENEVOLENT ASSN. v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE & TUNNEL AUTH.
Index No. 652171/20. Appeal No. 15955-15955A. Case No. 2021-01910.
205 A.D.3d 529 (2022)
166 N.Y.S.3d 524
2022 NY Slip Op 03218
In the Matter of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority Superior Officers Benevolent Association, Appellant, v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 17, 2022.
Decided May 17, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Davis & Ferber, Islandia (Christopher S. Rothemich of counsel), for appellant.
Proskauer Rose LLP, New York (Neil H. Abramson of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Oing, Moulton, González, Kennedy, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.