The hearing court correctly denied defendant's motion to suppress a surveillance video from the store where the homicide occurred. There is no reason to disturb the court's credibility determinations. The evidence established that defendant, an employee at his mother's store, lacked a legitimate expectation of privacy in the store's DVR system, and therefore lacked standing to contest the police conduct in taking the video (see generally People v Ramirez-Portoreal,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FALL
Ind. Nos. 4476/16, 2267/16. Appeal Nos. 15911-15911A. Case No. 2020-00430.
205 A.D.3d 482 (2022)
168 N.Y.S.3d 65
2022 NY Slip Op 03078
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cheichk Fall, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 10, 2022.
Decided May 10, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jared Wolkowitz of counsel), for respondent.
Concur— Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, González, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.