The motion court, following an in camera review, providently exercised its discretion in directing various communications to be produced by defendants to Gottwald. Defendants' internal correspondence concerning the Tweet at the heart of this litigation are not materials uniquely the product of a lawyer's learning and professional skills, such as those reflecting an attorney's legal research, analysis, conclusions, legal theory, or strategy, and are thus not privileged (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GOTTWALD v. GERAGOS
205 A.D.3d 417 (2022)
167 N.Y.S.3d 84
2022 NY Slip Op 02949
Lukasz Gottwald, Professionally Known as Dr. Luke, Respondent, v. Mark Geragos et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 3, 2022.
Decided May 3, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York (Ellyde R. Thompson of counsel), for Mark Geragos, appellant.
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Jura Zibas of counsel) and Thomas & LoCicero PL, Tampa, FL (Gregg D. Thomas of the bar of the State of Florida and James J. McGuire of the bar of the State of Florida, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for Geragos & Geragos, appellant.
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, New York (Christine Lepera of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gesmer, Moulton, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.