Defendants do not dispute that the complaint, which asserts a cause of action for legal malpractice, sufficiently alleges that Weinberger, an associate attorney, acted negligently while performing legal services on behalf of defendant law firm. Thus, dismissal of the complaint as against Weinberger is not warranted under the Partnership Law (Partnership Law § 26[c][i]; see e.g. Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FTF LENDING, LLC v. MAVRIDES, MOYAL, PACKMAN & SADKIN, LLP
205 A.D.3d 414 (2022)
165 N.Y.S.3d 692
2022 NY Slip Op 02946
FTF Lending, LLC, Respondent, v. Mavrides, Moyal, Packman & Sadkin, LLP, et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 3, 2022.
Decided May 3, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Fleischner Potash LLP, New York (Gil M. Coogler of counsel), for appellants.
Lippes Mathias LLP, Buffalo (Tessa R. Scott of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Friedman, Rodriguez, Pitt, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.