1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 204 A.D.3d
  5. 204 A.D.3d 611 (2022)
 

PECORA v. PECORA

Index No. 651768/14. Appeal No. 15820. Case No. 2021-02860.

204 A.D.3d 611 (2022)

168 N.Y.S.3d 26

2022 NY Slip Op 02876

Frank Pecora et al., Respondents, v. Antonino Pecora et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 28, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blank Rome LLP, New York (Michael D. Silverfarb of counsel), for appellants.

Loeb & Loeb LLP, New York (Frank D. D'Angelo of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Webber, Friedman, Oing, Kennedy, JJ.

The court should not have granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend their complaint. Plaintiffs failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their delay in moving to amend the complaint, as there was an extended period between the date they became aware of the cause of action and the date of their motion (see Oil Heat Inst. of Long Is. Ins. Trust v RMTS Assoc., 4 A.D.3d 290, 293 [1st...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases