The court providently exercised its discretion in granting the People's challenge for cause to a prospective juror who repeatedly stated that her work required her to be neutral and not reach judgments. She demonstrated that she had "a state of mind that [was] likely to preclude [her] from rendering an impartial verdict based upon the evidence adduced at the trial" (CPL 270.20[1][b]).
The court providently exercised its discretion in admitting, as past recollection...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.