The court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs' motion to sever the third-party actions notwithstanding any delay in commencing those actions, because plaintiffs made no showing that the main action will be delayed to their prejudice, and the discovery rights of the third-party actions can be accommodated (see CPLR 603, 1010; Nielsen v New York State Dormitory Auth.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.