Zeus's motion was based on matters that could have been raised, but were not raised, in its previous motion for summary judgment, and it showed no sufficient justification for the motion court to entertain a successive motion (see Fleming & Assoc., CPA, PC v Murray & Josephson, CPAs, LLC,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.