Given the court's prior determination that appellants had no interest in the property and that their application to set aside the sale of the property was untimely under CPLR 2003, appellants have no standing to object to the reasonableness of the sale (see e.g. Sansol Indus. v 345 E. 56th St. Owners,
In any event, the motion is untimely under CPLR...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.