Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly precluded the defendant from introducing purported prior inconsistent statements by a prosecution witness, because by failing to confront that witness with the statements and asking her whether she made them, the defendant failed to lay a proper foundation for their admission (compare People v Oliver, 193 A.D.3d 1081, 1082-1083 [2021], and People v Robertson, 172 A.D.3d 1239, 1239-1240...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.