1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 203 A.D.3d
  5. 203 A.D.3d 627 (2022)
 

IOANNOU v. 1 BK ST. CORP.

Index No. 160523/19. Appeal No. 15612. Case No. 2021-02075.

203 A.D.3d 627 (2022)

163 N.Y.S.3d 398

2022 NY Slip Op 02089

Athas Ioannou, Respondent, v. 1 BK Street Corp., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 29, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Golino Law Group, PLLC, New York (Santo Golino of counsel), for appellant.

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., New York (Jeffrey R. Metz of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Webber, Friedman, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.

Defendants failed to establish that the subpoena should have been quashed for being "utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry" (Velez v Hunts Point Multi-Serv. Ctr., Inc., 29 A.D.3d 104, 112 [1st Dept 2006]). On the contrary, the rent roll registration records sought in the subpoena are relevant to determine whether defendant engaged in a fraudulent scheme to deregulate plaintiff's apartment and other apartments in the building ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases