The terms of the parties' purchase agreement unambiguously provided that a condition precedent to closing was issuance of a rezoning of the property, defined to mean "residential with a commercial overlay," and that in the event that such rezoning was not issued in a specified time, plaintiff was entitled to terminate the agreement and be refunded the down payment (see Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ZL ELMHURST, LLC v. SUNSHINE ELMHURST REAL ESTATE
203 A.D.3d 534 (2022)
161 N.Y.S.3d 779
2022 NY Slip Op 01761
ZL Elmhurst, LLC, Respondent-Appellant, v. Sunshine Elmhurst Real Estate, Appellant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 15, 2022.
Decided March 15, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ganfer Shore Leeds & Zauderer LLP, New York (Steven J. Shore of counsel), for respondent-appellant.
Concur—Webber, J.P., Moulton, Kennedy, Mendez, Pitt, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.