Disqualification of David Wander as defendants' counsel is warranted based on a conflict of interest. It is undisputed that Wander previously served as counsel for the corporate defendants
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PORETSKY v. BARTLEBY & SAGE, INC.
203 A.D.3d 523 (2022)
161 N.Y.S.3d 760
2022 NY Slip Op 01751
Greta Poretsky, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Each of Bartleby and Sage, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Bartleby and Sage, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 15, 2022.
Decided March 15, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
The Law office of Alexander Paykin, P.C., New York (Alexander Paykin of counsel), for appellant.
Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, LLP, New York (David H. Wander of counsel), for respondents.
Concur—Webber, J.P., Moulton, Kennedy, Mendez, Pitt, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.