The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson,
However, the trial court admitted four statements made by the alleged victim following the incident, reasoning that they were admissible both as excited utterances and prompt outcries. This was error. The alleged victim's out-of-court statements
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.