The court providently exercised its discretion in awarding plaintiff pendente lite use and occupancy, as it would have been "manifestly unfair" for defendant "to remain in possession of the subject premises without paying for [its] use" (MMB Assoc. v Dayan,
Defendant's argument that the court's award of use and occupancy at the 200% holdover rate specified in the parties' lease was punitive...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.