The court properly granted plaintiff's motion to reargue and to designate JAMS as the forum for the parties' arbitration (see CPLR 2221[d]). The court had authority to designate an arbitral forum, since defendant, even after arguing on a prior motion that the parties were required to arbitrate their dispute, refused to submit the dispute to binding arbitration before any forum (see CPLR 7504; Zandman v Nissenbaum,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MECKLER v. MOLNER
Index No. 154332/19. Appeal No. 15285. Case No. 2021-02978.
202 A.D.3d 507 (2022)
158 N.Y.S.3d 830
2022 NY Slip Op 00943
Alan Meckler, Respondent, v. David Molner, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 10, 2022.
Decided February 10, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
David Molner, appellant pro se.
Kaiser Saurborn & Mair, P.C., New York (David N. Mair of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Gische, J.P., Kern, Moulton, Kennedy, Rodriguez, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.