The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress spontaneous statements he made while he was awaiting a lineup at a police station. As the court stated at the end of the hearing, it was undisputed that defendant had been lawfully arrested for an unrelated crime that occurred the day before defendant made the statements. Because defendant was in lawful custody for one crime, he could be placed in a lineup in connection with another (see People v Whitaker,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GOODSON
202 A.D.3d 487 (2022)
162 N.Y.S.3d 50
2022 NY Slip Op 00824
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Goodson, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 8, 2022.
Decided February 8, 2022.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Megan D. Byrne of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Philip V. Tisne of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Singh, Pitt, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.