In opposition to plaintiff's showing that defendants' vehicle rear-ended her vehicle, defendants offered the explanation that plaintiff's vehicle stopped abruptly. This assertion fails to constitute a nonnegligent explanation for the accident that would raise an issue of fact as to liability, since it does not explain why defendant driver failed to maintain a safe distance between his vehicle and the one ahead of it (see Urena v GVC Ltd.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.