Plaintiff failed to rebut defendants' evidence that the 2010 "Amended and Restated House Rules and Policies and Procedures" (the 2010 house rules) replaced the earlier version of the house rules, which required residents to obtain permission before harboring a pet. Moreover, plaintiff's president's affidavit statement that it was unclear whether the 2010 house rules were adopted failed to raise an issue of fact as to which house rules were in effect at the relevant time,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.