1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 178 A.D.3d
  5. 178 A.D.3d 620 (2019)
 

LOPEZ v. HICKS

10653N. 309896/12.

178 A.D.3d 620 (2019)

112 N.Y.S.3d 498

2019 NY Slip Op 09374

Julio J. Lopez, Appellant, v. Gregory M. Hicks et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 26, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Alexander Bespechny, Bronx (Alexander Bespechny and Yelena Gordiyenko of counsel), for appellant.

Lawrence Heisler, Brooklyn (Timothy O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Oing, Singh, González, JJ.

Plaintiff has not shown that the post-note of issue discovery directed by the Supreme Court caused him prejudice or was otherwise an improvident exercise of that court's broad discretion in supervising disclosure (see 22 NYCRR 202.21[d]; Cuprill v Citywide Towing & Auto Repair Servs., 149 A.D.3d 442, 443 [1st Dept 2017]; Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Occidental Gems, Inc., 11 N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases