Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was denied due process because the Supreme Court failed to advise him of the immigration consequences of his plea of guilty. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to raise the issue before the Supreme Court or move to withdraw his plea despite the indication on the record that he was aware of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty (see People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.